YOU'RE LISTENING TO

Mid Day Mix

2:00 PM - 3:00 PM

YOU'RE LISTENING TO

Mid Day Mix

2:00 PM - 3:00 PM

Rep. Chris Todd applauds U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding Tennessee law protecting children

NASHVILLE, Tenn. – State Rep. Chris Todd, R-Madison County, praised a major legal victory for Tennessee families as the United States Supreme Court upheld House Bill 9, a 2023 law designed to protect children from exposure to sexually explicit entertainment.

The high court on Monday declined to hear Friends of George’s v. Mulroy, allowing the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruling to stand, affirming the law’s constitutionality. Todd, who sponsored House Bill 9 in 2023, led efforts to ensure minors are shielded from inappropriate performances.

“I’m grateful to the United States Supreme Court for allowing the Sixth Circuit’s ruling to stand, a major victory for morality and basic protections for children,” Todd said. “Tennessee will continue to be a passionate advocate for families by supporting parental rights and protecting the innocence of minors. I continue to be proud of our state and Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti as we fight for common sense in our nation.”

The law prohibits sexually explicit performances from taking place in public spaces or anywhere minors may be present. It requires private establishments like bars or restaurants hosting sexually explicit shows to verify the age of all patrons by requiring valid identification upon entry.

The law reinforces Tennessee’s stance on parental rights and community standards while maintaining that adult entertainment should remain in age-appropriate venues.

(PHOTO: Chris Todd)

Share On

1 thought on “Rep. Chris Todd applauds U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding Tennessee law protecting children”

  1. Chris Todd has no idea what he’s talking about.

    The Supreme Court did not uphold the law. The Supreme Court decided not to hear the appeal. Thus, the Court said nothing about the law.

    The lower court decision didn’t uphold the law either. It held that the plaintiffs didn’t have standing. There has been no final decision on the validity of the law.

    It would be nice if you had someone with the most basic understanding of the law to write about it.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top
Monday-Friday
Saturday-Sunday

Deal Of the Day

Monday

MondayGet Deal

Stock Market Brought To You By Talk N West TN

Crypto Brought To You By Mann's Wrecker

    Bitcoin